Page 59 - Coespu 2020-2
P. 59

by  the  United Nations  in Ango-   concluded that  “belligerent  par-  has undermined the confi dence in
    la, Cambodia, Mozambique and  ties generally  enter the  peaceke-       the government and has helped to
    Rwanda. He defi ned the spoilers as  eping phase while keeping their  plunge these areas back into cha-
    “leaders and groups of individuals  grievances  and  war  goals intact.  os  and  confl ict;  however,  he  says
    who believe that the peace emer-    Each one of them tries to achieve  that premeditated inaction  and
    ging from negotiations threatens  in the shadow of the peace pro-       malicious slowness in carrying out
    their power, their worldview and  cess what it failed to achieve in the  the commitments taken in the pe-
    their  interests,  and, to avoid this,  phase  of  armed  confl ict.  (…)  For  ace agreements, are often nothing
    they use violence to undermine the  them peace is nothing more than  more than a way of doing politics.
    processes that try to reach it”. The  the continuation of the war carri-  As a  result, including non-violent
    defi nition subordinates the concept  ed out by other means”. Being war  behavior in the defi nition of “spoi-
    of “spoilers” to the presence or ab-  conducted by defi nition by violent  lers” would widen the scope of the
    sence of a peace agreement, and  means, and  being spoilers often  defi nition  to  such  an  extent  as  to
    not to activities that are carried out  non-violent,  the central question  include all subjects who behave in
    in a period prior to the agreement.  is whether the defi nition of “spoi-  a certain manner for political con-
    Subsequently, in 2008, the United  lers” can explicitly recognize and  venience.  In addition to this, legiti-
    Nations  incorporated  the  concept  include  non-violent behavior: in-  mate disputes on points reached in
    of  “spoiler” into  their peacekee-  deed, if there is a general consen-  the course of a peace processes do
    ping doctrine, which defi nes “spoi-  sus on the defi nition that identifi es  not constitute a behavior of “spoi-
    lers” as individuals or groups of in-  “spoilers”  as leaders, individuals  lers” but may simply represent the
    dividuals who believe that a peace  or  groups  of  individuals who  be-  pursuit  of  a  legitimate interest.
    process could threaten their power  lieve that  peace threatens their  In  order  to  fi nance  so-called
    and interests, therefore they will try  power and interest and therefore  “violent” behaviors, like insur-
    to sabotage it. This defi nition omits  act to sabotage it, the use or not  rections, protests, terrorist attacks,
    the use of violence as an essential  of violent behavior is the subject of  etc. “spoilers”  often have to fund
    element  of the                                                                         themselves    by
    spoiler,  there-   IN ORDER TO FINANCE SO-CALLED “VIOLENT”                              using    non-vio-
    fore in 2015                                                                            lent   behaviors,
    a report by the    BEHAVIORS, LIKE INSURRECTIONS, PROTESTS,                             such  as the mi-
    High  Level  In-   TERRORIST ATTACKS, ETC. “SPOILERS” OFTEN                             sappropriation
    dependent Pa-      HAVE TO FINANCE THEMSELVES BY USING                                  of public eco-
    nel on United                                                                           nomic     resour-
    Nations Peace      NON-VIOLENT BEHAVIORS, SUCH  AS THE MI-                              ces by  unfaithful
    Operations de-     SAPPROPRIATION  OF  PUBLIC  ECONOMIC  RE-                            offi cials,   em-
    fi ned the “spoi-                                                                        phasizing once
    lers” as those     SOURCES BY UNFAITHFUL OFFICIALS, EMPHA-                              again that in the
    who stand out-     SIZING ONCE AGAIN THAT IN THE AREAS OF                               areas  of  confl i-
    side the peace                                                                          ct the boundary
    process    and     CONFLICT THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN VIOLENT                                between violent
    try  to  sabota-   AND NON-VIOLENT BEHAVIORS REMAINS VERY                               and      non-vio-
    ge it, even  by                                                                         lent       beha-
    adopting  vio-     BLURRED AND SUBJECTIVE.                                              viors    remains
    lent methods.                                                                           very      blurred
    By specifying that “also”  violent  a heated debate among the par-      and                    subjective.
    methods exist, the Panel  actual-   ties. For example, Stedman reco-    The  defi nition  of  “spoiler”  is  the
    ly stated that the adoption of  gnizes the importance of non-vio-       basis of  any methodology  that
    non-violent methods can also con-   lent behavior by “spoilers”, like in  can  be developed, and the  lack
    stitute a spoiler behavior. A more  Afghanistan and Iraq, where cor-    of  a  common  defi nition  of  “spoi-
    pragmatic  view  on  the “spoilers”  ruption  and  misappropriation of  ler” by the organizations atten-
    is  provided by Jock  Covey , who  funds  by  corrupt  public  offi cials  ding the conference was a recur-





                                                       59
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64