Page 25 - Coespu 2020-2
P. 25

capacity void between the popula-   tervention is required, especially  disseminates  intelligence  and fe-
    ce’s security needs and the inabi-  in a  non-permissive  environment,  eds the force’s intelligence  cycle,
    lity or unwillingness of the indige-  NATO SP could be the most suitable  hence  improving the understan-
    nous police forces (IPF - if present),  or actually the only viable solution  ding of the operating environment.
    other relevant actors (UN, EU, AU  until other actors from the Interna-  A  number  of  factors can weaken
    et similia) and NATO conventional,  tional Community can intervene,  the performance of the IPF in fra-
    combat and warfi ghting means to  support and/or take over as a fol-     gile states,  including past,  pre-
    properly address these challenges].  low-on force, depending on a UN-   sent and developing confl icts, and
    Both authors take pride in having  SCR or Host Nation (HN) request.     manmade or natural disasters.  A
    served also as MP Offi cers and it  SP can create new avenues of ap-     weak or missing Rule of Law (ROL)
    is an uncontroverted fact that Mi-  proach to address traditional and   19   system in which individuals, pu-
    litary Police had  already  been in  emerging military problems with  blic and private entities,  and the
    existence  within  NATO and the  different, policing means.  Lethal/    state are not accountable to the
    United Nations. Anyhow, both In-    kinetic  tools and procedures are  law, combined with a frail Justice
    ternational Organizations (IO),  supported, where appropriate, by  Sector (Police, Judiciary and  Cor-
    the latter through the renowned  policing, non-kinetic and non-/less  rections)  are likely  to undermine
    “Brahimi report” in 2000,  did  than lethal ones. They are aimed  each other and result in a reduced
                     10
    not pursue  an increase,  expan-    at war, organized and transnatio-   effi ciency and effi cacy of local po-
    sion and/or improvement of their  nal criminals, terrorists and insur-  lice forces. Such a situation is likely
    MP  capabilities to  bridge  the  po-  gents, and violators of host-nation  to hamper governance and gene-
    licing  gap. In fact, they sought a  and international laws. This “Legal  rate  power and  enforcement va-
    more poignant,  inclusive  instru-  targeting”  creates effects on ad-  cuums,  which might be exploited
                                                 16
 OPPORTUNITY?  ment, a tool inspired by a new  versaries  by enforcing  internatio-  by irregular actors such as (war/or-
       vision, namely Stability Policing.
                                                                            ganized/trans-national) criminals,
                                        nal and applicable HN law throu-
    After 18 years, in 2016, NATO pro-  gh investigation or arrest, limiting/  terrorists and insurgents as well as
    mulgated the “Allied Joint Doctrine  restricting their mobility and liberty  spoilers and produce considerable
    for Stability Policing” (AJP-3.22), at  of action, seizing their assets and  levels  of insecurity and instability.
    present the operational level  and  fi nancial means  and dismantling  As a military capability that embo-
                                                       17
    sole Allied publication on the mat-  their networks and structures. Dedi-  dies and particularly emphasises
    ter . It states that SP can bridge the  cated SP Lines of Operation (LoO)  a  civilian- and  populace-oriented
      11
    policing gap through one or a com-  18   or SP elements within established  approach, SP is a key contributor
    bination of its two missions.  The  LoOs, can concur to deter, identi-  and  natural  actor  striving  for  a
    reinforcement of the IPF  entails  fy, locate, target and engage ad-    comprehensive approach. In fact, it
    intervening  on their  capabilities 12  versaries  or  spoilers, disrupt  their  fosters and seeks the best possible
    and capacity  to raise overall per-  networks and help attain objectives  level of interaction with other (civi-
                13
    formance to acceptable levels and  at tactical, operational and strate-  lian and/or military) IOs, the Host
    encompasses  monitoring, mento-     gic levels in a military campaign.  Nation and especially the IPF (re-
    ring, advising, reforming, training  The added benefi t of this approa-  gardless of their military or civilian
    and  partnering  with  (MMARTP) .   ch lies, among others, in furthering  status)  and  the populace  as well
                                   14
    The temporary replacement of the  the reduction in the use of force and  as  other  actors including NGOs.
    IPF  is the second SP mission  and  decreasing collateral damage be-    SP: when, where, how and who?
    may be required if they are mis-    sides responding to the security ne-  Does SP contribute to projecting
    sing or unwilling to carry out their  eds of the population. Therefore, it  stability?
    duties. Normally a UN mandate   15  contributes to improved acceptan-   It has been argued that SP cannot
    initiates a NAC decision to deploy  ce and legitimacy within audiences  contribute to  all the three NATO
    personnel under an executive poli-  from the local to the international  core tasks of collective defence, cri-
    cing mandate . This might be ne-    level and  enhancing mission su-    sis management and  cooperative
    cessary when other actors are not  stainability. SP furthermore iden-   security because it is framed solely
    able, willing or ready to intervene.  tifi es, collects and analyses police  within stability operations to bridge
    In fact, when a rapid policing in-  and  crime-related  information,  the policing gap, while the availa-





                                                       25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30