Page 27 - Coespu 2020-2
P. 27

frameworks  and national caveats  SP has been conducted under dif-      the law and to respond to people’s
    etc.). The guiding principle should  ferent names for more than two     requests for assistance on a variety
    always be that the Alliance’s stren-  decades in NATO-led operations,   of issues. The lack of an effective,
    gth lies in its cohesion and in the  often in a very hostile setting.   capable and trustworthy police for-
    sum and diversity of the contribu-  Other IOs,  such as  the  UN ,  the   ce undermines the credibility of the
                                                                   33
    tions of all its members, which as  European  Union (EU) ,  and  the    government, with detrimental ef-
                                                              34
    a whole is vastly greater than the  African Union (AU), all possible    fects on its legitimacy and overall
    sum of the single  capabilities.  It  partners for NATO SP,  performed   stability. This applies especially to
    has been argued that the existence  and  still perform  SP  operations,   fragile states and in crisis or con-
    of AJP-3.22 suffi ces and a dedica-  albeit under different names  and   fl ict areas, where consequently the
    ted SP Concept is not needed, but  perspectives. Despite this, SP is not   International Community, inclu-
    Doctrine is only one of the seven  yet suffi ciently known, understood   ding NATO, may be called to in-
    DOTMLPFI aspects of a capability.   and adopted even across NATO.       tervene to prevent crisis escalation
                                        Policing the local population or re-/  and/or support peace restoration.
    The NATO Stability Policing Cen-    building IPF have not been hither-  NATO military  operations  bene-
    tre of Excellence (NSPCoE)          to an immediate concern of NATO     fi t  from  the  inclusion  of  SP  as  a
    The NATO Stability Policing Cen-    decision  makers/commanders.  In    substantial contribution focusing
    tre  of  Excellence                                                                    on  the  IPF  and
    (NSPCoE)  is a       THE  ADDED  BENEFIT  OF  THIS  APPROACH                           the local  popu-
             30
    think-tank    that   LIES, AMONG OTHERS, IN FURTHERING THE                             lace. The aim of
    encompasses     a                                                                      SP is  to support
    Directorate   and    REDUCTION IN THE USE OF FORCE AND DE-                             the    re-/establi-
    three pillars, na-   CREASING COLLATERAL DAMAGE BESIDES                                shment  of a safe
    mely  the Doctrine                                                                     and secure  envi-
    and  Standardiza-    RESPONDING TO THE SECURITY NEEDS OF                               ronment (SASE),
    tion Branch, which   THE POPULATION.                                                   restoring   public
    develops concepts                                                                      order  and  secu-
    and contributes to                                                                     rity, and contri-
    improving the NATO doctrinal cor-   some instances, they  are consi-    bute  to create the conditions for
    pus with SP inputs and considera-   dered the exclusive remit of other,   meeting longer term needs with
    tions, including developing the SP  civilian, organizations and actors;   respect to  governance and  deve-
    concept, reviewing AJP-3.22 and  an erroneous belief, especially        lopment (especially  through the
    drafting ATP-103  ; the Education  considering  that the latter cannot   Security Sector Reform - SSR).   36
                    31
    and Training Branch designs trai-   be deployed in non-permissive en-   In the long term the Alliance as a
    ning curricula and hosts courses 32  vironments, which de  facto  could   whole (its individuals as well as the
    about  SP and the Lesson  Lear-     generate/deteriorate the policing   structure, institution and processes)
    ned (LL) Branch, that gathers best  gap. This attitude is gradually chan-  would profi t from a positive tran-
    practises and works the LL cycle to  ging but too slowly. Lessons lear-  sformation by acquiring a more
    feed experiences garnered in ope-   ned have shown that overlooking     police-like  mind-set. The desired
    rations  and  training into  a  data-  or delaying coordinated actions to   NATO end-state might indeed be
    base and ultimately into doctrine.  address the policing gap inevitably   better attained by focusing less on
    The NSPCoE is indeed the NATO  affects the mission, delays or hin-      the sole conventional defeat of the
    hub of expertise for SP and strives  ders the attainment of the desired   adversary but by integrating more
    to be the Alliance’s interface with  NATO end-state and may prevent     non-combat-oriented approaches,
    IOs and non-NATO institutions in  NATO forces from disengaging .        similarly to what a policing coun-
                                                                       35
    the SP arena. The Czech Republic,  The police  are the most visible     terpart  would  do.  This is particu-
    France, Greece, Italy, Poland, Ro-  manifestation of any government,    larly true in heavily populated en-
    mania, Spain, The Netherlands  being the institution  that  works       vironments  such as in urban and
    and Turkey contribute to the Centre.  within  and for the population to   littoral settings, where the attitude
    What can SP do for NATO?            provide their security, to  enforce   of the vast populace is to be taken





                                                       27
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32