Page 213 - Rassegna 2021-3
P. 213

THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM IN THE ERA OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION



                     He came to the conclusion: “our policies - and those of other free nations
               - resurrected China’s failing economy” .
                                                     (11)
                     The Trump administration concluded that the policy announced by the
               Nixon  administration  failed,  China  has  been  strengthening  and  growing  its
               influence. One could lament whether this really is the whole truth, or China’s
               rise has also been due to the country’s investment environment, for a long time
               low labor costs, competitiveness, and later its huge internal market. Certainly,
               its  internal  stability  based  on  nationalistic  mobilization  and  an  authoritarian
               system also played a role. In any case, the United States, understandably, do not
               argue with those factors.
                     There is no doubt that the Trump administration has made a decisive turn
               in this area in American politics, and also that it did so in a key area. It is so
               important that there is no chance of a return to the situation, for the following
               reasons:
                     1. It is in the vital interest of the United States to preserve its advantage
               and  delay  when  China  is  going  to  present  a  full-fledged  alternative  to
               Washington.
                     2. The Biden administration also has an interest in finding areas where it
               is not forced to break up with its predecessor’s policy and can maintain the
               bipartisan consensus in Washington. The great power competition with China
               (and Russia) is such. No significant change can be noticed in politics, and that
               is not to be expected. Of course, policy continuity does not mean the invarian-
               ce of the assets. Obviously, a more differentiated, ‘fine-tuned’ policy that relies
               more heavily on diplomatic means and seeks international support with allies
               and partners can be pursued even without a revision of the ultimate objective.
               Both  official  documents  and  pronouncements  of  the  Biden  administration
               have indicated that the determination is there to head in such a direction .
                                                                                      (12)
                     One may wonder why the United States want to see and show their rela-
               tionship with China through security goggles? Or to put it differently, why do
               the U.S. securitize this bilateral relationship? It is not disputed that there are
               security implications of this relationship. However, it would be an exaggeration
               to see it as a security rivalry.

               (11)  POMPEO, Michael R., Communist China and the Free World’s Future. Speech, Michael R. Pompeo,
                     Secretary  of  State.  The  Richard  Nixon  Presidential  Library  and  Museum,  Yorba  Linda,
                     California,  June  12,  2020,  https://2017-2021.state.gov/communist-china-and-the-free-
                     worlds-future-2/index.html Accessed July 24, 2021
               (12)  See Interim National Security Strategy Guidance… and BLINKEN, Anthony J., A Foreign Policy
                     for the American People. March 3, 2021. https://www.state.gov/a-foreign-policy-for-the-ameri-
                     can-people/ Accessed August 29, 2021.

                                                                                        211
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218