Page 50 - Coespu 2019-1
P. 50

IN DEPTH





























              THE ROLE OF NATO SP



                                 CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION








             By Stefano Bergonzini              document will focus efforts and re-  relevant actors and  the “traditio-
                                                cognise fundamental international  nal” NATO military instrument  of
                                                treaties, including the 1970 “UNE-  power, to address these challenges
                                                SCO Convention on the Means  properly. SP can expand the rea-
            Since now Cultural Property Pro-    on Prohibiting and Preventing the  ch of the Alliance creating effects
            tection (CPP) has regrettably been   Illicit  Import, Export and Transfer  in the remit of police, hitherto ne-
            only sporadically mentioned and     of  Ownership  of  Cultural  Proper-  glected by NATO, also to protect CP.
            partially covered  in  NATO doctri-  ty”, often overlooked by military  An adaptation-inspired approach
            ne, but the lack of a comprehen-    practitioners. It  should be condu-  to  SP  relegates it  to  stabilization
            sive document on this cross cutting   cive to mainstreaming CPP throu-  activities,  building police capabi-
            topic within the context of Human   ghout the NATO doctrinal corpus,  lities and capacity if they are ina-
            Security is finally being addressed   including the “Allied Joint Doctrine  dequate and temporarily replacing
            in line with the “Policy for the Pro-  for Stability Policing”  (AJP-3.22) .  the Host Nation (HN) police force.
                                                                                3
            tection of Civilians”  and the rela-  NATO operations in (armed) con-   In terms of CPP  this includes re-
                               1
            ted  Implementation Action Plan .   flicts  and  crises  in  general  and  cognising CP in the local context,
                                            2
            Once approved,  the new NATO        cultural property (CP) in particular  contributing  to  geo-/locating it,
            Bi-Strategic Command Directi-       benefit  from  the  inclusion  of  Sta-  feeding no-target-lists and deve-
            ve will go beyond the merely au-    bility Policing (SP)  to  bridge  the  loping priorities  in safeguarding
                                                                  4
            thoritative nature of doctrine and   police-related component of the  and respecting  items,  sites  and
                                                                                                   5
            provide  direction and  guidance    security gap.  This policing gap  is  people (e.g. artefacts and  relics,
            regarding CPP in the prepara-       the capability/capacity void betwe-  museums, monuments, and ruins,
            tion,  planning and  conduct  of    en the police-related needs of the  archaeological digs, collection cu-
            NATO and  NATO-led operations       civilian population and the inade-  rators and directors of museums).
            and missions, as well as training,   quacy of the IPF (if present), other  It means also that SP collects and
            education, and evaluation. The





                                                               50
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55