Page 50 - Coespu 2018-3
P. 50

smartphone ownership and the popularity of photo- and video-sharing social apps like Instagram
            and Snapchat. If taking pictures can lead to weaker encoding of representations in memory, then
            this is an important facet of the cognitive impact of ubiquitous smartphone usage. Recent qualitative
            research provides first-hand accounts that one’s interactions with smartphones and the ‘check-in’
            capability  of  some  social  media  apps  as  well  as  photos  taken  with  one’s  phone  help  establish  a
            topographical memory that can both supplant and augment one’s memory of their surroundings and
            experiences  (Özkul  and  Humphreys,  2015).  Studies  investigating  the  relation  between  digital
            photography and memory have assumed that photographs are stored or shared in a semi-permanent
            matter. Thus, while the act of taking photographs may change memory encoding during an event,
            the  photographs  provide  an  opportunity  to  review  and  recollect  the  experience  at  a  later  time.
            However,  recent  trends  in  social
            media use have prioritized ephemeral
            photo-sharing. For example, Snapchat
            allows user to send and post pictures
            and videos that can only be viewed a
            limited number of times or for a finite
            period.    Users    may      therefore
            experience  the  same  effects  on
            memory  in  the  moment,  without  the
            added opportunity to refer back to the
            photograph  or  video  as  an  external
            source of information/memory.  Little
            is yet known about the specific effects
            of ephemeral photo-sharing tools on memory for events.
            Another  common  concern  regarding  the  “offloading”  of  our  semantic  memory  into  a  modern
            technological  device  regards  the  impact  of  GPS  mapping  systems  on  our  ability  to  navigate  the
            world. Crafting an accurate cognitive representation of our spatial surroundings is crucial for us to
            effectively and efficiently get from one place to another. It has been posited that constant reliance
            on GPS navigation systems, which are now integrated into smartphone devices, interferes with our
            natural tendency to develop cognitive spatial representations. Media headlines insist that these car
            technologies  are  “creating  stupid  drivers”  (Moskvitch,  2014)  and  there  are  many  compelling
            instances in which a driver blindly followed an inaccurate GPS direction into peril (Hansen, 2013).
            As  GPS  navigation  devices  pre-exist  smartphone  technology,  so  too  does  the  related  scientific
            literature.  In a study published a decade ago, researchers sought to identify the consequences of
            overreliance on GPS navigational devices (Burnett and Lee, 2005). Specifically, the authors wanted
            to know whether use of GPS navigational devices impacted their participants’ tendency to create
            cognitive  maps  when  maneuvering  through  a  novel  environment.  To  do  this,  Burnett  and  Lee
            recruited experienced drivers to navigate around a 3D digitally rendered virtual environment. The
            virtual  environment  resembled  a  medium-sized  neighborhood,  and  included  many  buildings  and
            other landmarks such as trees, signs, and people. The between-subjects design required half of the
            participants to study a map of the environment for as long as they wished before hitting the road in
            an attempt to reach their destination using the most direct route possible. Conversely, the other half
            of participants were allowed to study the map for only 20 s, and then commenced their journey,
            which was accompanied with turn-by-turn voice guidance to the destination. After the participants




                                                           48
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55